The 100-Day goal
Cut the time to finalise a domestic violence matter, and lift the number of finalisations achieved each court day.
The results
Time to finalisation dropped from five months to three.
Daily finalisations doubled. The court had been closing around ten matters on Mondays, Tuesdays and Thursdays, and five on Wednesdays and Fridays. Over the 100 days, those daily counts doubled across the week.
Postponement dates moved substantially. A matter postponed in July would previously have come back to court in January. It now returns in November.
Who did the work
The team pulled in everyone who touches a domestic violence file: court staff, law enforcement, legal professionals and social services, working to one clock rather than five separate ones.
How they did it
The team went after the postponement date first, because that is where the months hide. A postponement is issued in seconds and costs half a year. They asked what the next available date actually needed to be rather than what it had always been, and the answer turned out to be far sooner than the roll suggested.
They then worked backwards through each step of the process and asked what genuinely had to happen before a matter could be heard. Steps that existed out of habit came out. That is what made the higher daily volume possible without adding staff.
Underneath both, the relationships did the real work. When SAPS, prosecutors and social services all treat a delay as their problem, a file stops sitting on someone’s desk waiting for someone else.
What continues
The shortened postponement dates are now the court’s operating practice, not a sprint measure. So is the working relationship across the agencies, which was the hardest thing to build and is the thing that would take longest to rebuild if it lapsed.