Kenya National Food Fortification Alliance: three fortified cooking oil brands on shelves in 100 days

Food fortification is cheap and the health case is settled. Getting it to happen is the hard part. In Kenya, years of meetings and workshops on fortification had produced action plans and calls for more meetings, and little else. Stakeholders were drifting away. Fortifying salt with iodine in the 1990s had taken more than two years, so the idea that anything could move faster was not widely believed.

For a manufacturer like Dr John Hare, a senior manager at one of Kenya’s leading cooking oil producers, the block was trust. Signing up to a multi-year fortification project with untested partners, as he put it, was like agreeing to marry someone he knew nothing about.

The 100-Day goal

Place at least three fully certified Vitamin A-fortified cooking oil or edible fat brands on store shelves.

The team’s first draft of the goal was to build a certification system. They rejected it themselves, on the reasoning that a system could exist on paper and still put no fortified product in a single shop. Rewriting the goal around brands on shelves forced them to design the system and use it.

The results

Achieved at day 130, thirty days past the 100-day mark.

On 1 March 2007 the Ministry of Health granted three brands the right to use a new fortification logo, regulated by the Ministry of Health and enforced by the Kenya Bureau of Standards. That brought 15% of the market into compliance with official fortification standards, and an estimated 3.6 million Kenyans into reach of increased Vitamin A intake.

A KNFFA official said more was achieved on fortification during the initiative than in all the years since the salt iodisation effort.

Who did the work

Nine technical staff from public and private sector organisations, meeting once every one to two weeks. Support came from the Micronutrient Initiative and the Rapid Results Institute. Senior leaders, Dr Hare among them, held to 30-minute meetings with their own team members every three to four weeks and a joint review at day 50.

How they did it

The change that made it work was senior leaders stepping back. Fortification had always been stuck at the level of senior policy discussion, which is exactly the level with no time for it. Handing the operational goal to technical staff, with leaders in a support and mentoring role, freed the work to move.

Two blockages nearly cost them the deadline. The team could not test oil-based products for Vitamin A with the existing method, and discovered late that they needed an entirely new protocol, which they researched and designed in under 30 days with MI’s technical support. This is where the thirty extra days went.

The second was the machinery of government communication. Early on, messages travelled as official memos up one organisation’s hierarchy and down another’s, meetings needed formal invitations and elaborate minutes, and anything to a private company required sign-off. The team broke with all of it. Memos became emails and SMS, formal meetings became phone calls and impromptu office visits, and one member started using email regularly for the first time in his career. The procedural shortcuts they invented were absorbed into their organisations’ other work.

What continues

The KNFFA moved straight into a second 100-day initiative on the harder problem of fortifying flour with iron, zinc and folic acid, which certified two flour brands. Plans then formed to scale up coverage across the flour and cooking oil industries and extend the logo to a wider range of staple foods. The case’s own conclusion is that outside facilitation was heavy in the first cycle and significantly scaled back in later ones, which is the capacity actually transferring.

Share the Post:

Thought starter reflection questions

Jot down thoughts on these questions – to the extent they are relevant to your experience at the session:
  • When did the mood in the event shift from “why are we here?” to “this could be interesting – I am excited to be part of this.” What triggered this shift? 
  • When did you have to go “off script” on the agenda or to change the agenda? What triggered this? What did you adjust? How did it go?
  • What was most surprising to you at the event?
  • What new insights did you gain about the issue at hand, and about the way leaders in the system interacted with each other?
  • Where did the conversation get stuck? What got it unstuck?
  • How would you characterise the level of trust among participants in the meeting? To what extent did this shift as the meeting progressed? To what do you attribute this shift, if indeed it happened?

Thought starter...

Reflection Questions 

Jot down thoughts on these questions – to the extent they are relevant to your experience at the session:

  • When did the mood in the event shift from “why are we here?” to “this could be interesting – I am excited to be part of this.” What triggered this shift? 
  • When did you have to go “off script” on the agenda or to change the agenda? What triggered this? What did you adjust? How did it go?
  • What was most surprising to you at the event?
  • What new insights did you gain about the issue at hand, and about the way leaders in the system interacted with each other?
  • Where did the conversation get stuck? What got it unstuck?
These are 100-Day Challenge Mentors. 

They did some work before you received the Challenge Note. This included:

  • Writing the Challenge Note, and making sure that the leaders of all the organisations represented on the team are comfortable with it – and committed to supporting the work of the team
  • Helping the leaders of these organisation recruit you and your colleagues to the team
  • Gathering some baseline data and other information that will help you and your teammates set your 100-Day goal and develop your plan.
  • Making sure all the preparations are made for a successful Lift-Off workshop, when you and your teammates will meet and get your 100-Day Challenge started. This includes venue, facilitation support, food, swags, comms, travel arrangements and whatever else is needed.

 

Mentors will participate in all or part of the Lift-Off Workshop, mostly at the start to provide context and answer questions, and at the end to give you and your teammates feedback about the goal and plan you develop.

During the 100 days following the Lift-Off Workshop, here’s what the Mentors will do:  

  • They will check in every two weeks with the team leaders to see how the team is doing and what support they and the team need.
  • They will keep other organisational leaders informed and engaged during the 100 days, and pull them in to help as needed.
  • They will participate in the last part of the Refuelling Workshop, halfway through the 100 days, to see what additional support the team needs, and to begin to plan with the team for sustainability and scale-up.
  • They will work with the team at the Sustainability Workshop to finalise recommendations on sustaining the results and building on the work of the team.