Eritrea’s Ministry of Education: HIV prevention reaching 40,000 students in 100-day waves

The scale of HIV/AIDS tends to swallow the response. Time and energy go into strategy, policy and curriculum while little changes in schools. Eritrea's national adult HIV prevalence sat at an estimated 2.4% in 2004, low by regional standards, and the government's aim was to keep it there or push it down rather than wait for it to climb.

The 100-Day goal

At a national launch, stakeholders voted on six promising areas and chose school-based behaviour change as the most popular, on the reasoning that young people were at greatest risk and schools were where lifelong values form. The goal was to elicit measurable change in HIV prevention inside 100 days, starting small and expanding on what each phase taught.

The results

Phase I ran with 1,200 students in six secondary schools in zoba Maekel. Phase II expanded to 14,200 students across eleven secondary and ten junior schools, reaching into zoba Northern Red Sea. Phase III reached 19,000 students in fifteen secondary and sixteen junior schools, extending to zoba Anseba and Gash Barka.

Total reach came to around 40,000 students, teachers, supervisors, administrators and community members across four of Eritrea’s six zobas.

Among students aged 16 to 18, reported abstinence moved from 90% in Phase I toward 98% and then 99% across the phases. The report is candid that the short cycle made rigorous evaluation hard, so these are self-reported figures rather than verified behaviour.

Who did the work

A cascade structure inside the zoba Ministry of Education. A zoba education officer led as strategic leader, two coaches from the education office ran teacher training, school team leaders coordinated work teams, and peer leaders, one for every 20 students and elected by their peers, delivered the sessions. The Ministries of Health and Information, zoba assemblies, the HAMSET project, religious leaders and PTAs all played defined roles.

How they did it

The design put students in front of students. Teachers trained peer educators during the week, and peer educators ran the Friday sessions themselves, with teachers deliberately absent so young people would speak freely. Sessions used dramas, role-plays, debates and case studies rather than lectures, and implementers ranked the participatory activities as far more effective than pamphlets or art exhibitions.

The single most important decision was structural. When Phase I’s two coaches could not cover the expansion, the zoba education officer chose not to hire more coaches. Instead he made RRI a standard part of every school inspector’s job and folded monitoring into routine inspection. That turned RRI from a vertical programme dependent on special staff into a horizontal one built into the ministry’s daily work.

Extracurricular clubs pushed the message past the school gate, with drama and music clubs producing street theatre and World AIDS Day exhibitions.

What continues

The lessons were built into the life-skills curriculum now taught in all junior and secondary schools, which is the most complete form of institutionalisation on record across these international cases. The horizontal integration into the inspectorate means the method does not leave when a coach leaves.

Share the Post:

Thought starter reflection questions

Jot down thoughts on these questions – to the extent they are relevant to your experience at the session:
  • When did the mood in the event shift from “why are we here?” to “this could be interesting – I am excited to be part of this.” What triggered this shift? 
  • When did you have to go “off script” on the agenda or to change the agenda? What triggered this? What did you adjust? How did it go?
  • What was most surprising to you at the event?
  • What new insights did you gain about the issue at hand, and about the way leaders in the system interacted with each other?
  • Where did the conversation get stuck? What got it unstuck?
  • How would you characterise the level of trust among participants in the meeting? To what extent did this shift as the meeting progressed? To what do you attribute this shift, if indeed it happened?

Thought starter...

Reflection Questions 

Jot down thoughts on these questions – to the extent they are relevant to your experience at the session:

  • When did the mood in the event shift from “why are we here?” to “this could be interesting – I am excited to be part of this.” What triggered this shift? 
  • When did you have to go “off script” on the agenda or to change the agenda? What triggered this? What did you adjust? How did it go?
  • What was most surprising to you at the event?
  • What new insights did you gain about the issue at hand, and about the way leaders in the system interacted with each other?
  • Where did the conversation get stuck? What got it unstuck?
These are 100-Day Challenge Mentors. 

They did some work before you received the Challenge Note. This included:

  • Writing the Challenge Note, and making sure that the leaders of all the organisations represented on the team are comfortable with it – and committed to supporting the work of the team
  • Helping the leaders of these organisation recruit you and your colleagues to the team
  • Gathering some baseline data and other information that will help you and your teammates set your 100-Day goal and develop your plan.
  • Making sure all the preparations are made for a successful Lift-Off workshop, when you and your teammates will meet and get your 100-Day Challenge started. This includes venue, facilitation support, food, swags, comms, travel arrangements and whatever else is needed.

 

Mentors will participate in all or part of the Lift-Off Workshop, mostly at the start to provide context and answer questions, and at the end to give you and your teammates feedback about the goal and plan you develop.

During the 100 days following the Lift-Off Workshop, here’s what the Mentors will do:  

  • They will check in every two weeks with the team leaders to see how the team is doing and what support they and the team need.
  • They will keep other organisational leaders informed and engaged during the 100 days, and pull them in to help as needed.
  • They will participate in the last part of the Refuelling Workshop, halfway through the 100 days, to see what additional support the team needs, and to begin to plan with the team for sustainability and scale-up.
  • They will work with the team at the Sustainability Workshop to finalise recommendations on sustaining the results and building on the work of the team.